By mid-2026 the frontier is a photo-finish. On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (July 2026), OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol holds the top composite score at 58.9, with Claude Opus 4.8 (55.7) and GPT-5.6 Terra (55.0) close behind; Google’s Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the LMArena text board within a statistical tie of Opus. Since that snapshot, our 3 September review placed two Chinese models inside the global top four — Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-Max (58) and Moonshot’s Kimi K3 (57.1) — so the US-only leaderboard implied below no longer holds.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
But there is no single “best.” The honest answer is that the best model depends on the task in front of you — Claude and GPT-5.6 for agentic coding, Gemini for multimodal and 2M-token context, DeepSeek and Qwen for near-frontier reasoning at a fraction of the price. Below we rate every major lab’s flagship on a defined nine-point rubric and tag each with what it is actually best for.
Two Chinese models now sit inside the global top four — a change the July ratings below do not yet reflect. The US-frontier scores on this page are carried forward from July and are pending re-verification.
| Figure | Was | Now | Source & date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alibaba flagship | Qwen3.7-Max | Qwen3.8-Max — Intelligence Index 58 | Report AI, Chinese AI Models 2026, 3 Sep 2026 · HIGH |
| Chinese models in global top four | none listed | Qwen3.8-Max (58) and Kimi K3 (57.1) | Report AI, Chinese AI Models 2026, 3 Sep 2026 · HIGH |
| US-frontier composites | Sol 58.9 · Opus 4.8 55.7 · Terra 55.0 | unchanged — pending re-verification | Carried forward from Jul 2026; not yet re-checked against the primary leaderboard |
Why the third row is not updated: our rule is that a figure changes only against its primary source. The Artificial Analysis leaderboard could not be reached at the time of this review, and the secondary trackers we checked disagreed with one another by as much as 12 index points. Rather than publish a number we cannot stand behind, we are marking the row open. See Chinese AI Models 2026 for the figures that were verified this month.
We score each model 1–5 (rendered as ●●●●○ filled/empty dots) across nine criteria:
- Reasoning & Math
- Coding
- Writing & Language
- Multimodal (vision / audio / video)
- Long context
- Speed & latency
- Price / value
- Reliability (factual accuracy, low hallucination)
- Agentic & tool use
Ratings synthesize named public leaderboards — LMArena / Chatbot Arena, Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench Pro, MMLU-Pro, GPQA Diamond, AIME / HMMT, and MMMU-Pro — plus published pricing and context specs, as of July 2026 for the US frontier, and 3 September 2026 for the Chinese models. These scores are an editorial synthesis of public benchmarks, not absolute fact; leaderboards shift weekly and some benchmarks (e.g. SWE-bench Verified) face contamination questions. This page is on a monthly review cadence. It was reviewed on 10 September 2026: the Chinese-model figures were updated, and the US-frontier composites were left unchanged and flagged as pending because the primary leaderboard could not be reached at review time — see the change block above. Next review: October 2026.
The comparison matrix
Rows = models · Columns = the 9 criteria · scroll horizontally on mobile →
| Model | Reason & Math |
Coding | Writing | Multi- modal |
Long ctx |
Speed | Price / value |
Reliab- ility |
Agentic | Overall | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI |
●●●●● | ●●●●● | ●●●●● | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●○○ | ●●○○○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●● | ●●●●● | Agentic workflows, science & reasoning |
| Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic |
●●●●● | ●●●●● | ●●●●● | ●●●○○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●●● | ●●●●● | ●●●●○ | Agentic coding & long-form writing |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro |
●●●●● | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●● | ●●●●● | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | Multimodal & 2M-token context |
| Qwen3.8-Max Alibaba |
●●●●● | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●● | ●●●●○ | Long-horizon agents & multilingual |
| DeepSeek V4-Pro DeepSeek |
●●●●● | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●● | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | Cheapest near-frontier reasoning (open weight) |
| Grok 4.5 xAI |
●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●●● | ●●●●○ | Real-time agentic tool use |
| Llama 5 Meta |
●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●●● | ●●●●○ | ●●●●● | ●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | Open-weight, ultra-long-context self-hosting |
| Mistral Large 3 Mistral |
●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●●○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | EU data-sovereign, efficient open deploy |
Model by model
GPT-5.6 Sol · OpenAI
Overall ●●●●●Best for: agentic workflows, science & reasoning
R&M ●●●●● · Code ●●●●● · Write ●●●●● · MM ●●●●○ · Ctx ●●●●○ · Speed ●●●○○ · Price ●●○○○ · Rel ●●●●○ · Agent ●●●●●
Generally available July 9, 2026, the Sol flagship tops the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at 58.9 and sets state-of-the-art marks on agentic evals — BrowseComp 92.2%, OSWorld 2.0 62.6%, and the Coding Agent Index at 80. Its clear weakness is price: at $5 / $30 per million tokens it is the most expensive flagship here, so the cheaper Terra ($2.50 / $15) and Luna ($1 / $6) tiers carry most everyday work.
Claude Opus 4.8 · Anthropic
Overall ●●●●○Best for: agentic coding & long-form writing
R&M ●●●●● · Code ●●●●● · Write ●●●●● · MM ●●●○○ · Ctx ●●●●○ · Speed ●●●○○ · Price ●●●○○ · Rel ●●●●● · Agent ●●●●●
Launched May 28, 2026 at $5 / $25, Opus 4.8 leads the coding-focused SWE-bench Pro board (69.2%) and scores 88.6% on SWE-bench Verified, and it holds the top tier of the LMArena text leaderboard within a statistical tie. Its reliability and writing quality are class-leading; its softest dimension is multimodal, where it trails Gemini on vision, audio and video. For teams that want Opus-class coding cheaper, Sonnet 5 ($3 / $15, $2 / $10 intro) is the value sibling.
Gemini 3.1 Pro · Google
Overall ●●●●○Best for: multimodal understanding & 2M-token context
R&M ●●●●● · Code ●●●●○ · Write ●●●●○ · MM ●●●●● · Ctx ●●●●● · Speed ●●●●○ · Price ●●●●○ · Rel ●●●●○ · Agent ●●●●○
Gemini 3.1 Pro pairs the frontier’s largest usable window — 2M tokens — with the best multimodal scores in the field: MMMU-Pro 81.0% and GPQA Diamond 94.3%, plus a LiveCodeBench Pro Elo near 2,439. It sits in the LMArena top three in a statistical tie with Opus. Coding trails Claude and GPT-5.6 by a hair on agentic SWE tasks, but for anything spanning documents, images, audio and video, nothing else is close.
Qwen3.8-Max · Alibaba
Overall ●●●●○Best for: long-horizon agents & multilingual work
R&M ●●●●● · Code ●●●●○ · Write ●●●●○ · MM ●●●●○ · Ctx ●●●●○ · Speed ●●●●○ · Price ●●●●○ · Rel ●●●●○ · Agent ●●●●●
Alibaba’s current flagship, and the strongest non-US frontier model. Our 3 September 2026 review put it at an Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 58 — inside the global top four. That score has been volatile across successive captures (53 → 56 → 58), so treat the precise value as MEDIUM confidence rather than a settled number. It supersedes Qwen3.7-Max (May 2026), whose figures this page previously carried and which we retain for comparison: GPQA Diamond 92.4%, HMMT Feb 2026 97.1%, SWE-bench Verified 80.4%, and a demo run of 35 straight hours across 1,158 tool calls. The top Max tier is proprietary, but the open-weight Qwen line makes the ecosystem exceptionally deployable — including Qwen3.8-27B (index 52), which runs on a single consumer GPU. Note: the nine-criteria ratings in the matrix above are inherited from the Qwen3.7-Max assessment and are due for re-rating.
DeepSeek V4-Pro · DeepSeek
Overall ●●●●○Best for: cheapest near-frontier reasoning, open weight
R&M ●●●●● · Code ●●●●○ · Write ●●●●○ · MM ●●●○○ · Ctx ●●●●○ · Speed ●●●●○ · Price ●●●●● · Rel ●●●●○ · Agent ●●●●○
Shipped April 24, 2026 under an MIT license, the 1.6T-parameter V4-Pro is the standout open-weight value: MMLU-Pro 87.5, GPQA Diamond 90.1, SWE-bench Verified 80.6% (tied with Gemini 3.1 Pro as the top open entry) — at roughly $0.87 per million output tokens. It is weakest on multimodal, and NIST’s CAISI review judged its all-round capability to lag the closed frontier by about eight months, but on price-per-point of reasoning nothing beats it.
Grok 4.5 · xAI
Overall ●●●●○Best for: real-time agentic tool use
R&M ●●●●○ · Code ●●●●○ · Write ●●●●○ · MM ●●●○○ · Ctx ●●●○○ · Speed ●●●●○ · Price ●●●●○ · Rel ●●●○○ · Agent ●●●●●
Released July 8, 2026, Grok 4.5 lands around #4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (score 54) and takes the single top spot on agentic tool use, backed by Terminal-Bench 2.1 at 83.3% and SWE-bench Pro at 64.7%. At $2 / $6 it is priced aggressively. The trade-offs are a smaller 500K context window and a shorter reliability track record than the incumbents.
Llama 5 · Meta
Overall ●●●○○Best for: open-weight, ultra-long-context self-hosting
R&M ●●●○○ · Code ●●●○○ · Write ●●●○○ · MM ●●●○○ · Ctx ●●●●● · Speed ●●●●○ · Price ●●●●● · Rel ●●●○○ · Agent ●●●○○
Announced April 8, 2026, Llama 5 is a ~600B open-weight model with a headline 5M-token context. Its value proposition is freedom — free to self-host with the longest context of any release here. But coverage as of July 2026 is mixed: reporting disputes whether Llama 5 is a full frontier generation, and independent boards place its reasoning and coding a clear tier below the closed leaders. It shines when you need weights you own plus enormous context, not when you need the top benchmark score.
Mistral Large 3 · Mistral
Overall ●●●○○Best for: EU data-sovereign, efficient open deployment
R&M ●●●○○ · Code ●●●○○ · Write ●●●●○ · MM ●●●○○ · Ctx ●●●○○ · Speed ●●●●○ · Price ●●●●○ · Rel ●●●○○ · Agent ●●●○○
Mistral Large 3 (December 2025) is a 675B-parameter open-weight MoE — the largest from a Western lab — scoring MMLU-Pro 73.11 and MATH-500 93.6 on independent evals. It is a tier below the US and Chinese frontier on raw capability, but its European base, permissive weights, and efficient Medium 3.5 and Small 4 tiers make it the default for cost-sensitive, data-sovereign EU deployments.
Which model should you use?
- Coding
Claude Opus 4.8 — tops SWE-bench Pro (69.2%); GPT-5.6 Sol is a near-equal alternative on agentic coding. - Writing & language
Claude Opus 4.8 — the reference for long-form prose and voice; GPT-5.6 Sol close behind. - Reasoning & math
GPT-5.6 Sol — #1 on the Intelligence Index; Gemini 3.1 Pro leads GPQA Diamond (94.3%). - Multimodal
Gemini 3.1 Pro — best MMMU-Pro (81.0%) plus native audio and video. - Long context
Gemini 3.1 Pro (2M tokens) for hosted use; Llama 5 (5M) if you self-host. - Cheapest capable
DeepSeek V4-Pro — near-frontier reasoning at ~$0.87 per million output tokens. - Open-weight & self-hostable
DeepSeek V4-Pro (MIT) for capability; Llama 5 / Mistral Large 3 for ecosystem and licensing.
FAQ
What is the best AI model in 2026?
There is no single winner, and the answer now depends on which month you ask. As of July 2026, GPT-5.6 Sol held the top overall composite (Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 58.9), with Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 3.1 Pro in a statistical tie just behind on LMArena. Our 3 September 2026 review then placed two Chinese models inside the global top four — Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-Max (58) and Moonshot’s Kimi K3 (57.1). The US-frontier composites on this page are carried forward from July and are pending re-verification, so treat the ordering at the very top as provisional. The best model still depends on the task — see the matrix above.
What is the best AI model for coding?
Claude Opus 4.8 leads SWE-bench Pro (69.2%) and is the reference for agentic coding, with GPT-5.6 Sol essentially tied on agentic coding evals. For value, Claude Sonnet 5 delivers near-Opus coding at roughly 40% lower cost.
What is the cheapest capable AI model?
DeepSeek V4-Pro — an MIT-licensed open-weight model at about $0.87 per million output tokens that still posts MMLU-Pro 87.5 and GPQA Diamond 90.1, near-frontier reasoning for a fraction of the flagship price.
Go deeper
- LLM market statistics 2026
- Chinese AI models 2026, ranked — the Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 figures behind this month’s change
- AI models benchmarks statistics 2026
- Open vs closed AI models 2026
Sources
- Artificial Analysis, Intelligence Index Leaderboard, July 2026 — https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/artificial-analysis-intelligence-index
- LMArena, Text / Chatbot Arena Leaderboard, 2026 — https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text
- OpenAI, “GPT-5.6: Frontier intelligence that scales,” Jul 9 2026 — https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-6/
- Anthropic, “Introducing Claude Sonnet 5,” 2026 — https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-5
- Google DeepMind, Gemini 3.1 Pro model card, 2026 — https://deepmind.google/models/model-cards/gemini-3-1-pro/
- SpaceXAI (xAI), “Introducing Grok 4.5,” Jul 8 2026 — https://x.ai/news/grok-4-5
- SWE-bench, Verified & Pro Leaderboards, July 2026 — https://www.swebench.com/
- Scale AI, SWE-bench Pro (public) Leaderboard, 2026 — https://labs.scale.com/leaderboard/swe_bench_pro_public
- DeepSeek, V4 model & benchmarks, Apr 24 2026 — https://api-docs.deepseek.com/
- NIST CAISI, Evaluation of DeepSeek V4 Pro, May 2026 — https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/05/caisi-evaluation-deepseek-v4-pro
- Vals AI, Qwen3.7-Max model page, 2026 — https://www.vals.ai/models/alibaba_qwen3.7-max
- Vals AI, Mistral Large 3 model page, 2026 — https://www.vals.ai/models/mistralai_mistral-large-2512
- Stanford HAI, 2026 AI Index Report — Technical Performance — https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report/technical-performance