Home / Reports / Florida Sues OpenAI
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
News Report · The AI Index
Florida Sues OpenAI and Sam Altman: The First State Case Over ChatGPT Safety
On June 1, 2026, Florida filed the first state-led lawsuit against OpenAI — and named CEO Sam Altman personally — accusing the company of marketing ChatGPT to the public, including children, while concealing safety risks. Here is what the complaint actually alleges, and what is still unproven.
Key takeaways
- Florida AG James Uthmeier filed the suit on June 1, 2026 in the Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit, Highlands County — the first time a U.S. state has sued OpenAI and named Sam Altman as a defendant. (FL Attorney General)
- The complaint alleges deceptive and unfair trade practices: that OpenAI aggressively marketed ChatGPT — including to minors — while suppressing internal safety warnings and misrepresenting the product’s risks.
- It highlights that the free version of ChatGPT has no age verification, and that parents cannot access what a child has shared with the bot even on linked accounts.
- A separate criminal investigation ties to a shooter who allegedly consulted ChatGPT before an April 2025 attack — that is not the same as this civil case. OpenAI has denied responsibility; none of the allegations have been tested in court. (NBC / NPR)
What the complaint alleges
According to the Florida Attorney General’s office, the lawsuit claims OpenAI “knowingly released and aggressively marketed” ChatGPT to the public — including children — while “concealing serious risks, suppressing internal safety warnings, and deceiving Floridians about the true nature and dangers of the product.” The complaint argues the company and Altman prioritized speed to market and commercial gain over user safety and “disregarded repeated warnings from experts both inside and outside the company.”
A central factual claim concerns minors: the filing states that the free version of ChatGPT has “no gatekeeping or age verification mechanism,” that OpenAI does not require children’s accounts to be linked to a parent’s account, and that — even where accounts are linked — parents cannot request access to what a child has shared with the chatbot.
Why this one is different
Plenty of private plaintiffs have sued AI companies. What makes the Florida action notable is that it is state-led and brought under consumer-protection authority, and that it names the CEO as an individual defendant. Attorney General Uthmeier has said OpenAI and Altman could be liable “for potentially up to billions of dollars” in penalties — a figure that reflects per-violation statutory damages under Florida’s deceptive-practices law, not a proven amount.
“Allegations are not findings of fact — this is the first state-led suit to name both OpenAI and its CEO, and none of it has been tested in court.”
The separate criminal investigation
Uthmeier’s office has also confirmed a separate criminal investigation into OpenAI connected to a shooter who allegedly consulted ChatGPT ahead of an April 2025 attack. It is important to keep the two matters distinct: the June 1 filing is a civil consumer-protection lawsuit, while the criminal inquiry is a different track with a different standard of proof. Reporting to date does not establish a proven causal link between the product and any specific act of violence.
OpenAI’s response
OpenAI has denied responsibility for the incidents referenced in the lawsuit and maintains that its systems include extensive safety measures, including content safeguards and crisis-response behavior. As of publication, the allegations are unproven and the case is at the complaint stage.
Editorial note: This report summarizes allegations from a civil complaint and a confirmed criminal investigation. Allegations are not findings of fact. Figures such as “up to billions” reflect the Attorney General’s statements about potential statutory penalties, not an adjudicated amount.
Frequently asked
Who sued OpenAI and Sam Altman?
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed the lawsuit on June 1, 2026 in the Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit, Highlands County. It is the first state-led lawsuit to name both OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman as defendants.
What does the lawsuit allege?
It alleges deceptive and unfair trade practices: that OpenAI marketed ChatGPT to the public including children while concealing risks, suppressing internal safety warnings, and that the free version lacks age verification. The allegations are unproven.
Is this the same as the criminal investigation?
No. The June 1, 2026 filing is a civil consumer-protection lawsuit. The Florida Attorney General is separately running a criminal investigation tied to a shooter who allegedly consulted ChatGPT before an April 2025 attack. The two are distinct matters.
Cite this page
The AI Index (2026). Florida Sues OpenAI and Sam Altman. Retrieved Jun 20, 2026, from report-ai.org/reports/florida-openai-lawsuit-chatgpt-safety/
Related: All reports · AI companions & mental-health harms · The Dark Side of AI
On this page
- What it alleges
- Why it’s different
- The criminal probe
- OpenAI’s response
- Frequently asked
- Cite this page
Sources
- Florida Attorney General — press release on the lawsuit, Jun 1, 2026
- NBC News, NPR, CNN — reporting on the filing, Jun 1–2, 2026
- TechCrunch, Fortune — filing & criminal-probe context
“Up to billions of dollars” in potential penalties — the AG’s figure for per-violation statutory damages, not a proven amount.
Share